top of page

Action Research

Introduction

As described by Mertler and Thompson, action research data collection is an approach that empowers teachers and improves schools in genuine and sustainable ways. It enables teachers and school leaders to act as researchers within their facilities, testing their ideas, identifying growth opportunities, and making informed decisions directly impacting students' experiences. By engaging in an active action research cycle, teachers better understand their student's diverse needs and acknowledge the responsibilities that come with this understanding. 

 

The beauty of this approach lies in its continual nature; it involves observation, planning, action, and reflection, constantly adapting and improving based on what is learned. Fostering a belief in formal learning enhances both well-being and professional development. Mertler and Thompson Thompson reinforce the idea that education should focus on internal solutions, empowering teachers with a deeper insight into the realities of their classrooms. Action research represents a necessary change in education from within, promoting a healthy and safe environment.

 

In early childhood education, particular emphasis is placed on developing language and math skills during the early years of life. In a diverse and technology-rich school environment, it is crucial to explore various educational approaches that strengthen each student's capabilities, including those with special needs.

 

The present study addresses the implementation of a blended learning model that incorporates station rotation and interactive applications, fostering meaningful, child-centered teaching at the preschool level. By employing mixed methods, this research aims to measure not only language and math skills but also students' overall experience in the classroom. By examining these dimensions, the study seeks to contribute to the body of knowledge regarding best practices in early childhood education and provide a framework for strategies that promote active participation and child-centered learning.

 

As I move forward with my innovation proposal to enhance early language and math learning skills through blended learning and interactive applications, I recognize the importance of contextualizing my findings in relation to my existing educational practices. My technology integration proposal transforms how students interact with information and fosters a talented and inclusive learning environment. 

Compared to these initiatives, the use of technology such as iPads for students with limited mobility addresses the diverse needs of all my students. The accompanying literature review offers a robust framework for best practices in implementing blended learning while developing language and math skills. Although the existing literature reveals significant gaps, it underscores the relevance and timeliness of my study within the educational landscape.

You can refer to my implementation outline for a detailed overview of the structure and approach of my action research. This outline includes the objectives, methodologies, and the intended analysis that will guide my study, ensuring the effective implementation of my innovation proposal. 

Access my Implementation Outline

Outline Assignment

  1. What is the topic of your action research?

  • We are enhancing early language and math skills in preschool students, including those with special needs, through a blended learning model and station rotation.

    II. What is the purpose of your study

  • To assess the effectiveness of the blended learning model in enhancing language and math skills by creating an inclusive learning environment that encourages students to take an active role in their education.

    III. What is your research question?

How does the blended learning model, which includes station rotation and technological applications, affect the development of language and math skills in preschool students, including those with special needs?

 IV. What is your research design (Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed Methods)

  1. Why did you choose this design

 

  • Mixed Methods Approach: We will use qualitative and quantitative approaches to understand the intervention comprehensively

  • Quantitative Component: We will measure specific improvements in language and math skills through standardized assessments.

  • Qualitative Component: We will explore students' and educators' experiences and perceptions regarding the implemented model.

 

V.  What data will you collect?

 

  • Quantitative Data: Results from language and math skills assessments (e.g., accuracy in identifying letters and numbers). 

  • Qualitative Data: Surveys, interviews, and observations that capture students and levels of engagement.

 

VI. What types of measurement will you use?

 

  • Quantitative: Standardized assessments for language and math skills (CLI). Structured questionnaires to measure student progress. 

  • Qualitative data is gathered through semi-structured interview guides with students and teachers and recordings of classroom observations during implementation.

VII.  What is the focus of your lit review?

 

The literature review will focus on previous studies regarding the effectiveness of blended learning in preschool education, the application of digital technologies in teaching, and best practices for inclusive education. It will examine research that documents the impact of station rotation on learning and skill development across various contexts.

 Referencias

Mertler, C. A. (2019). Investigación-acción: Mejorar las escuelas y empoderar a los

educadores (6.ª ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education:

Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to

Achievement. Routledge.

bottom of page