top of page

Literacy Review II

Introduction

 

Early language and math learning lays the foundation for later academic and personal development. However, many preschool settings, particularly in under-resourced communities, face challenges such as limited access to technology and diverse student needs, including special learning requirements. Therefore, innovative approaches are necessary to address these issues.

 

This innovation case focuses on implementing a blended learning approach in preschool classrooms in Cleveland, Texas. The program aims to enhance the language development and math comprehension of both regular and special needs students. Research indicates that interactive educational methods within technology-based environments positively affect students' learning and information retention. For instance, Mayer highlights that interactive multimedia tools help learners grasp information holistically and represent its structure in working memory. This underscores the importance of connecting concepts with their physical counterparts.

 

This strategy is crucial for addressing educational gaps and offering differentiated instruction in rural and disadvantaged communities. My interest in this thesis stems from my experience in low-resource environments and the effectiveness of various interactive tools and strategies for improving learning opportunities for children with disabilities. In addition to addressing students' immediate needs, this approach provides students with a foundation for more competitive and equitable academic progress.

 

Literature Review

 

From the required readings, discussions over the past few weeks, and additional research, I have identified several studies supporting my innovation plan's concepts. The major topics I have explored include the impact of blended instructional approaches, the integration of students with disabilities, and using technology in early instruction.

 

  • Blended Learning and Differentiation

 

Blended learning, which combines in-person and cloud-based instruction, has proven effective for personalized training and fostering greater engagement. According to Horn and Staker, students can work independently when content is delivered online, which benefits assignments involving skill disparities. This approach allows for tailored local study experiences, making it advantageous for both students with learning disabilities and those who require additional challenges.

 

  • Inclusive Education and Special Needs

 

Integrating students with disabilities is essential for creating an equitable teaching environment. Sharma and Salend note that educational technologies provide cloud access to personalized resources and promote autonomy and participation for students with disabilities, particularly in subjects like language arts and mathematics. These insights are particularly relevant, as preschool classrooms play a crucial role in shaping academic trajectories.

 

  • Technology in the Classroom: Impact on Early Learning

 

Numerous studies indicate that technology in elementary education positively affects cognition and motivation. Hsin, Mokhtari, and Choi report that using scientific devices and apps to teach concepts related to nature and abstract language enhances understanding and prepares children for ideal behavioral patterns. This study's data supports using platforms like 123Andres and Khan Academy Kids as adequate educational resources.

 

  • COVA Model: Choice, Ownership, Voice, and Authenticity

 

Overall, the COVA model, which emphasizes choice, ownership, voice, and authenticity, is an educational approach that fosters storytelling, empowerment, and responsibility over one’s learning experiences. Hattie asserts that educational frameworks that give students a voice in their learning processes significantly improve student outcomes. This model directly relates to ownership, vital in encouraging children to take responsibility for their education.




Research Topics and Subtopics

 

Based on the analyzed research question and a foundation for theoretical and practical exploration, the following topics and subtopics can be examined:

 

1. Pre-K Blended Learning
 

  •   Learning Stations Rotation Model  

  •  How can a learning station rotation model enhance the understanding of language and mathematics among Pre-K students?

 

Overview

Blended learning integrates in-person and digital instruction to create a flexible, adaptable, and student-centered environment. In a station-rotation model, students switch between various activities—including teacher-led sessions, independent workstations, and technology use—promoting personalization and inclusivity.

The rotation model significantly benefits students with disabilities by providing differentiated and accessible activities tailored to their specific needs (Clayton et al., 2020).

Implementing a rotation model enhances the organization of time and resources in the classroom while also creating opportunities for every student, regardless of their level or abilities. I have witnessed how these strategies lead to small moments of success that build my students' confidence.

 

Subtopics and Related Studies

 

1.1. Pedagogical Advantages of Blended Learning

Research demonstrates that this approach enhances student engagement and enables students to learn independently (Horn & Staker, 2015). In high-need environments, blended learning promotes equity by offering technological resources to students with diverse abilities (Graham, 2006).

 

 1.2. The impact of the rotation model on inclusion

 

This model effectively supports students with disabilities by offering differentiated and accessible activities tailored to their needs (Clayton et al., 2020).


 

2. Technology's Role in Personalizing Learning for Regular and Special Needs Students

 

Language and math skills are essential for academic success. Pre-K students should develop these skills through playful and integrated methods that are accessible to children with diverse abilities.

 

Learning Technology:

 

  •  How can educational technology be employed to personalize learning for regular students and those with various special needs?  

 

Technology's Impact on Special Needs Student Inclusion:  

 

  •    Pre-K Technology Best Practices  

  •    Which technology applications are most effective for students with disabilities in the Pre-K setting?  

  •    How can technology assist in developing motor, language, and cognitive skills in toddlers and schoolchildren with special needs?

 

Related Subtopics and Studies

 

2.1 Language and Phonology Development

 

Research indicates that early exposure to the alphabet and phonology significantly influences future literacy (Adams, 1990). Tools such as interactive games promote multisensory learning, enabling children to connect sounds and letters effectively (Neuman et al., 2021).

 

2.2 Mathematical Foundations in Early Childhood

 

Studies emphasize the importance of counting, understanding cardinality, and using visual representations to develop logical-mathematical thinking (Clements & Sarama, 2011).

 

Language and mathematics are the bridges to other areas of learning. Observing my students' excitement when they recognize a letter or solve a simple problem reaffirms my belief in the necessity of inclusive strategies that foster these essential skills from the very beginning.


 

3. COVA Model in Pre-K Classroom 

 

The COVA approach has allowed me to transform my classroom into a space where my students learn and feel like active participants in their learning process. This change is not just pedagogical; it is deeply human.

 

3.1 Challenges and Opportunities in Applying a COVA Model in the Pre-Kindergarten Setting: 

 

  •   How can classroom choice, ownership, voice, and authenticity be implemented to enhance engagement and decision-making opportunities for toddlers and young children?  

 

  •  What are the advantages of a COVA approach in a blended learning environment?

 

 The COVA (Choice, Ownership, Voice, and Authenticity) model empowers students by giving them control over their learning. This approach encourages autonomy and active participation among all students in inclusive settings.

 

Subtopics and Related Studies

 

3.1. Autonomy and Ownership of Learning  

Offering students genuine choices and authentic tasks enhances their engagement and intrinsic motivation (Lombardi, 2007).

 

3.2. Impact of Authenticity in Inclusive Education  

Research shows that learning becomes more meaningful when activities align with students' daily lives and interests (Herrington et al., 2010).

 

"

Expected Outcomes

 

Blended learning and the rotation model provide a solid foundation for personalizing instruction and promoting inclusion. Educational technology enhances language and math skills, particularly for students with disabilities. The COVA approach encourages meaningful, student-centered learning, which strengthens student autonomy and voice.

 

Enhanced Participation and Autonomy:

 

  •  Students, particularly those with special needs, will have increased opportunities to direct their learning processes, fostering motivation and active participation.

  

Cognitive and Academic Development:

 

  •  Students' comprehension of language and mathematics will improve by focusing on platforms and gaming.

  

Effective Inclusion:

 

  • Technology-based support will help students with disabilities keep pace with their cognitive and academic development.


 

Conclusion

 

This review emphasizes the importance of adopting innovative teaching methods, such as blended learning and the COVA model, in Pre-K classrooms, especially in low-resource rural communities. Integrating technology not only enhances access to educational content but also boosts student engagement, encourages independence, and supports inclusion for students with disabilities. As I progress in developing and implementing my innovation plan, this research serves as a strong foundation for evaluating the impact of my proposed strategies and adjusting the plan as necessary to maximize effectiveness.

 

It has been argued that blended learning, in combination with inclusive approaches and the COVA model, serves as a transformative strategy for addressing the needs of learners from the earliest stages. This method is particularly beneficial in low-resource settings, where diversity is often greater. Integrating educational technology and rotation models in classrooms facilitates personalized instruction, fosters student autonomy, and creates a more equitable environment by including learners with disabilities in meaningful learning experiences. 


 

As a result, my decision-making process for the innovation plan is validated, highlighting the need to continue exploring ways to adjust my strategies to achieve the intended impact. When technology is applied deliberately and learner-centered, it can foster a dynamic learning environment that supports learners from early adulthood, preparing them to tackle academic challenges with confidence and enthusiasm. This approach lays the foundation for a journey characterized by ongoing reflection and purposeful action.

I want to express my heartfelt gratitude to everyone who has been a part of this journey: my colleagues, mentors, and students. Your curiosity, patience, and commitment have inspired me to continue dreaming big. This journey has been more than just a proposal for innovation; it has reminded me of the transformative power of education when it is approached with purpose and passion. I am thankful for the lessons shared and the challenges overcome, as they have not only helped me grow as an educator but also as a person. This achievement belongs to all those who believe that every child deserves a chance to shine. Thank you for walking alongside me!

By Siary Rodriguez

Referencias

Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve

schools. Jossey-Bass.

Sharma, U., & Salend, S. J. (2016). Inclusive education in classrooms: A guide for

teachers. Sage Publications.

Hsin, C. T., Cigas, J., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). The effectiveness of educational technology

in early childhood education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 75, 89-106.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to

achievement. Routledge.

Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). The design of blended learning:

A literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1-21.

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC horizon

report: 2014 higher education edition. New Media Consortium.

Benson, J. D., & Waller, M. E. (2019). Student voice in personalized learning: A case

study approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 64-75.

bottom of page